DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015012178-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-04-15

000127458

Contested design: 015012178-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 015012178-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Turlen Holding SAvia PDF extraction

Switzerland (CH)

Rue du Jura 11, 2345 Les Breuleux Switzerland

Represented by

Ipside

Holder · RCD owner

Lijun Wuvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

7th Floor, Gongxin Derong Building, Shiyiheng Road, Hengjiangxia, Changping Town, Dongguan City, 523565 China

Represented by

Qiang Zhou

Prior art cited (1)

International designD3

RM 35-01 Richard Mille watch case

DM/083216 · www.richardmille.com; www.my-watchsite.fr

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier Richard Mille RM 35-01 watch-case disclosures, including D3 and 2014 website evidence.
  • Holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the 2014 internet disclosures, found at least average designer freedom, and held that the many shared watch-case features dominated the overall impression.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to bear costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberChiara BORACE
  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PEREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

10.07

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130161

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000130127

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000127515

vs Changzhou Fengxue Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-06-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123378

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123374

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123375

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123355

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123394

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108