DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008561021-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-03-19

000123355

Contested design: 008561021-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008561021-0003 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Turlen Holding SAvia PDF extraction

Switzerland (CH)

Rue du Jura 11, 2345 Les Breuleux Switzerland

Represented by

Cabinet Wiplaw

Holder · RCD owner

Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

(self-edited Building 1) No. 106, Fengze East Road, Nansha District, Guangzhou China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Prior art cited (1)

International design

watches

International design registration No 205 343 · International Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2020-04-17

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested wristwatch design copied the distinctive Richard Mille design language and lacked novelty and individual character.
  • The applicant relied in particular on earlier International design registration No 205 343; the holder filed no observations.
  • The Division found the earlier design had been validly disclosed before the filing date and that the designer enjoyed broad freedom for wristwatch designs.
  • It held that the shared original features outweighed the differences, so the contested design created the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid in full, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberDimitrios ANDRIANOPOULOS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

10.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130161

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000130127

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000127515

vs Changzhou Fengxue Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-06-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
0001274582025-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123374

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123375

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123378

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123394

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108