DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008561021-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-03-19

000123378

Contested design: 008561021-0004

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008561021-0004 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Turlen Holding SAvia PDF extraction

Switzerland (CH)

Rue du Jura 11, 2345 Les Breuleux Switzerland

Represented by

Cabinet Wiplaw

Holder · RCD owner

Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

(self-edited Building 1) No. 106, Fengze East Road, Nansha District, Guangzhou China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Applicant's RM 11-03 'Chronograph Flyback' wristwatch shown for sale on the applicant-cited website.

www.my-watchsite.fr

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, arguing the contested wristwatch copied the design DNA of its Richard Mille RM 11-03 watch.
  • The applicant relied on website screenshots showing its RM 11-03 Chronograph Flyback offered for sale since 2016; the holder filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted the internet evidence as sufficient disclosure, found broad designer freedom for wristwatches, and identified many shared arbitrary visual features between the designs.
  • Those similarities outweighed the dial, crown, strap-colour, and other differences, so the contested design produced the same overall impression and lacked individual character.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberDimitrios ANDRIANOPOULOS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

10.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130161

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000130127

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000127515

vs Changzhou Fengxue Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-06-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
0001274582025-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123375

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123394

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123374

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123355

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108