DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004135762-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-11-29

000121954

Contested design: 004135762-0004

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 004135762-0004 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Weifen Huvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 88, Zhaoxu Village North, Huyuan Township, Lishui City, Jinyun County, Zhejiang Province, China

Represented by

Konstantin Tahtadjiev

Holder · RCD owner

Owen Tech (Suzhou) Electronic CO., LTD.

China (CN)

Room 204, Building 1, No.112 Yingchun south road, Suzhou City, Jiangsu Province, China

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCDAnnex 1

letter boxes

RCD No 002723882-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2015-06-25

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant claimed the contested letter-box design lacked individual character over earlier RCD No 002723882-0001, disclosed in the Community Designs Bulletin.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found broad design freedom for letter boxes and held that the front-view similarities outweighed minor differences in colour and details.
  • The contested design created the same overall impression as the prior design, so the application was upheld and the RCD declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000127177

vs Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129361

vs Xiaoxia LI

2025-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129266

vs Taiyuan Jiuchangsheng Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000124780

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258