DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004135762-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-12-05

000121794

Contested design: 004135762-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 004135762-0003 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Weifen Huvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 88, Zhaoxu Village North, Huyuan Township, Lishui City, Jinyun County, Zhejiang Province, China

Represented by

Konstantin Tahtadjiev

Holder · RCD owner

Owen Tech (Suzhou) Electronic CO., LTD.

China (CN)

Room 204, Building 1, No.112 Yingchun south road, Suzhou City, Jiangsu Province, China

Prior art cited (1)

National design

letter boxes

UK design registration No 90038542980012 · UK Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2017-04-28

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character over earlier UK design registration No 90038542980012 for letter boxes.
  • The applicant argued designer freedom was high and the earlier UK design had been disclosed before the contested filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the earlier UK registration was validly disclosed and that differences in square placement, holes, screws, and colour did not alter the same overall impression.
  • The application was upheld and the contested design was declared invalid, with costs awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000127177

vs Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129361

vs Xiaoxia LI

2025-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129266

vs Taiyuan Jiuchangsheng Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000124780

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258