DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008486203-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-12-12

000121894

Contested design: 008486203-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity against RCD No 008486203-0001 is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

1. Se desestima la solicitud de declaración de nulidad del modelo comunitario registrado n.º 008486203-0001. 2. Se condena al solicitante a que sufrague las costas del titular, fijadas en 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Activeshopvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Graniczna 8B DC2A, 54-610 Wrocław, Polonia

Represented by

Agnieszka Byra

Holder · RCD owner

CosmoGlo LLC

United States (US)

1503 Hermosa Avenue, Hermosa Beach California 90254 Estados Unidos

Represented by

Casas Asin, S.L.

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure⚠ rejected as evidence

CosmoGlo floor lamp shown in social media posts and videos

Social media disclosures of the CosmoGlo lamp on Instagram, Reddit, YouTube and Facebook · Instagram, Reddit, YouTube and Facebook · disclosed 2020-05-10

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on earlier disclosures of the CosmoGlo floor lamp on Instagram, Reddit, YouTube and Facebook.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found one Instagram screenshot did not show the prior design completely, and the remaining social media materials fell within the Article 7(2) grace period because they were attributable to the holder.
  • The invalidity grounds under Article 25(1)(b) failed, so the application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to pay EUR 400 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN Bavel

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268