DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003119601-0012

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-01-04

000122277

Contested design: 003119601-0012

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 003119601-0012 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Топ Тен EOODvia PDF extraction

Bulgaria (BG)

ul. Zhelezarska no. 9, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria

Represented by

Stoyan Sirakov

Holder · RCD owner

Doors Bulgaria EOODvia PDF extraction

Bulgaria (BG)

j.k. ‘Pobeda’, bl. 9, floor 2, app. 10, 9000 Varna, Bulgaria

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

door

http://vrati-sofia.net · Wayback Machine / vrati-sofia.net · disclosed 2016-05-07

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over several earlier door designs.
  • The applicant relied on Wayback Machine screenshots of http://vrati-sofia.net archived on 07/05/2016 showing prior design D1; the holder filed no observations.
  • The Division found D1 had been validly disclosed online before the filing date and that the contested design differed only in immaterial details.
  • The contested design lacked novelty under Article 5(1)(b) CDR, so the application was upheld and the holder was ordered to pay costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberCarmen SÁNCHEZ PALOMARES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000127177

vs Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129361

vs Xiaoxia LI

2025-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129266

vs Taiyuan Jiuchangsheng Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000124780

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258