DesignVerdict
← Back to search
Contested design 003119601-0010

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-01-04

000122295

Contested design: 003119601-0010

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0031196010010 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Топ Тен EOOD

Bulgaria (BG)

ul. Zhelezarska no. 9, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria

Represented by

Stoyan Sirakov

Holder · RCD owner

Doors Bulgaria EOOD

Bulgaria (BG)

j.k. 'Pobeda', bl. 9, floor 2, app. 10, 9000 Varna, Bulgaria

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

door shown in Wayback Machine screenshots

http://vrati-sofia.net · Wayback Machine · disclosed 2016-05-07

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 5(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over several earlier designs.
  • Applicant relied in particular on Wayback Machine screenshots of http://vrati-sofia.net archived on 7 May 2016 showing a similar door as D1.
  • Holder filed no observations despite being invited to respond.
  • The Division found D1 had been publicly disclosed before the filing date and that the contested design differed only in immaterial details.
  • The application was upheld on lack of novelty under Article 5(1)(b), so the Division did not examine individual character or the remaining cited designs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberCarmen SÁNCHEZ PALOMARES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000108310

vs TA Towers ApS

2026-06-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000108309

vs TA Towers ApS

2026-06-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000130546

vs BESTON METAL S.R.L.

2026-06-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000130586

vs ANTEC SOLAR S.R.L.

2026-06-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258