DesignVerdict
← Back to search
Contested design 006306833-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-01-16

000121483

Contested design: 006306833-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid in full, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 006306833-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Hannes Freudenthaler

Austria (AT)

Almesberg 6/2 A, 4211 Alberndorf, Linz, Austria

Represented by

Elzaburu, S.L.P.

Holder · RCD owner

Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal

Netherlands (NL)

Legioen 8, 2211ZZ Noordwijkerhout, Netherlands

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

steps, ladders and scaffolds

RCD No 002293811-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2013-09-03

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested two-step folding ladder was effectively identical to the holder's earlier RCD and therefore lacked novelty and individual character.
  • To support disclosure, the applicant filed an Office database extract for earlier Community design No 002293811-0001 published on 3 September 2013.
  • The holder filed no reply despite being invited, so the Division assessed novelty first under Articles 5 and 7 CDR.
  • The Division found the earlier design had been validly disclosed and that the compared ladder designs differed only in immaterial details, so the contested RCD was not new and had to be invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberCarmen SÁNCHEZ PALOMARES
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000108310

vs TA Towers ApS

2026-06-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000108309

vs TA Towers ApS

2026-06-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000130546

vs BESTON METAL S.R.L.

2026-06-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000130586

vs ANTEC SOLAR S.R.L.

2026-06-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258