DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006778205-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-02-13

000120760

Contested design: 006778205-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 350.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 006778205-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 350.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €350

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

PatentEnter s.r.o.via PDF extraction

Czechia (CZ)

Koliště 1965/13a, 60200 Brno-Černá pole, Czechia

Represented by

PatentEnter s.r.o.

Holder · RCD owner

Zhejiang Zhengte Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

No. 811, Oriental Ave., Linhai, Zhejiang 317004, China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

louvered roof pergola shown in a YouTube video screenshot

https://www.youtube.com · YouTube · disclosed 2018-12-13

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character, relying mainly on a YouTube-disclosed earlier louvered roof pergola and arguing several contested features were technical or insignificant.
  • The holder denied technical-function objections were substantiated, claimed designer freedom was constrained, and argued differences in proportions, screws, crank handle, and louver-blade design created a different overall impression.
  • The Division accepted the YouTube screenshot as prior disclosure, found high designer freedom for gazebos, and treated the contested design's main visible structure and blade arrangement as very close to the earlier design.
  • The small differences identified by the holder did not alter the overall impression, so the contested design lacked individual character and was declared invalid with costs against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000127177

vs Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129361

vs Xiaoxia LI

2025-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129266

vs Taiyuan Jiuchangsheng Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000124780

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258