DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008720353-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-02-13

000121321

Contested design: 008720353-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld; Registered Community design No 008720353-0001 is declared invalid; the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 008720353-0001 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Paweł Radzik Inmanivia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Tadeusza Kościuszki 36, 38-300 Gorlice, Polen

Holder · RCD owner

Trenkle & Trenkle GbR

Germany (DE)

Unterriedweg 3, 87459 Pfronten, Deutschland

Represented by

Meissner & Meissner

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

RAMASS Fitness Push Up Bars, Wooden Mini Parallettes, Gymnastic Bars, Calisthenics

ASIN B07SYQDM7F · amazon.pl · disclosed 2021-04-22

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying in particular on Amazon.pl listing D1 for RAMASS mini parallettes available since 22/04/2021.
  • Holder argued the design had individual character, designer freedom was limited for such sports equipment, and the Amazon evidence did not prove the product's earlier appearance.
  • The Division found the Amazon.pl page sufficiently proved public disclosure of D1 before 07/10/2021, and the holder did not rebut that disclosure with concrete evidence.
  • Because the two parallettes shared nearly identical overall form and proportions, the contested design created no different overall impression and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218