DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006291696-0009

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-02-21

000120098

Contested design: 006291696-0009

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; Registered Community design No 006291696-0009 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità è accolta. 2. Il disegno o modello comunitario registrato n. 006291696-0009 è dichiarato nullo. 3. Il titolare sopporta l’onere delle spese, fissate a 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Zava s.r.l.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via dell'Industria, 43bis, 31041 Cornuda – Treviso Italia

Represented by

Feltrinelli & Brogi

Holder · RCD owner

Panzeri Carlo s.r.l.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Mameli, 11, 20851 Lissone (MB) Italia

Prior art cited (1)

Prior use

Earlier lighting apparatus design "Rings anello ⌀400" / "Rings sospensione orizzontale D40 cm".

commercial sale corroborated by a 2014 catalog and 2014 technical drawings · disclosed 2016-06-30

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based mainly on its earlier "Rings" lighting design disclosed before the contested filing date.
  • The holder argued the contested lamp had distinctive internal-step and lighting-body features and that a crowded prior art field reduced the designer's freedom.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier Rings design through the contract, catalog, technical drawings, and invoice, and found no proven market crowding limiting design freedom.
  • Comparing the registered representations, the Division found the designs shared the same overall circular ring form and proportions; minor internal-line differences did not change the overall impression.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b), so the RCD was declared invalid and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268