DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009029614-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-02-26

000122834

Contested design: 009029614-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay costs fixed at EUR 350.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0090296140001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 350.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €350

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

JSM Fitness Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnościąvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Bociana 6C/66, 31231 Kraków, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Aike Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

2005 Dongsheng Pavilion, Gold Fu Yuan, Gold South Rd., Nanwan St., Longgang Dist., Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

Represented by

Metida

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

RESTCLOUD Neck and Shoulder Relaxer, Cervical Traction Device for TMJ Pain Relief and Cervical Spine Alignment, Chiropractic Pillow Neck Stretcher (Blue)

https://www.amazon.com; ASIN B07 QSF J8S2 · Amazon · disclosed 2019-06-12

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on an earlier Amazon product listing for an ergonomic pillow.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon listing as prior disclosure from 12 June 2019 and found the designs produced the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character, so the RCD was declared invalid and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.09

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068