DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008442222-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-02-29

000120384

Contested design: 008442222-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested registered Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

1. Se estima la solicitud de declaración de nulidad. 2. Se declara nulo el dibujo o modelo comunitario registrado n.º 008442222-0001. 3. Se condena al titular a que sufrague las costas del solicitante, que se fijan en 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Luis Miguel Aroca Fuentesvia PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Llebeig, 13, 03430 Onil/Alicante, España

Holder · RCD owner

Nines Artesanales d'Onil, S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Calle Jaime I, 22, 03430 Onil/Alicante, España

Represented by

Anastasia Pérez Román

Prior art cited (1)

Prior useD1

Prior doll design from the holder’s 2020 collection

Instagram post by a distributor and disclosure at Spielwarenmesse 2020 / holder catalog · disclosed 2020-01-29

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on prior disclosure of the same doll before 26 February 2021.
  • Holder argued its long-standing doll line differed because the contested design introduced larger movable eyes with thick black eyelashes, creating a different overall impression.
  • The Division found D1 had been disclosed before the filing date and that the designer’s freedom for dolls was broad, so small eye differences carried limited weight.
  • Because the designs produced no different overall impression on the informed user, the contested design lacked individual character and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218