DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001470041-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-03-01

000121039

Contested design: 001470041-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 001470041-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Patryk Zieleźnicki trading as Stretch Concept Patryk Zieleźnickivia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Szkolna, nr 1, lok. A, 05503 Głosków, Poland

Represented by

Dubois i Wspólnicy Kancelaria Adwokacko-Radcowska sp.j.

Kacper Kazimierz Krawczyk

Holder · RCD owner

Folpol Robert Barzyk, Jacek Cyganvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Mikołaja Reja 6, 05532 Wólka Załęska, Poland

Represented by

Joanna Kluczewska-Strojny

Prior art cited (1)

Patent

Stretch film having heat-sealed edges

EP 1 095 759 · European Patent Office patent database · disclosed 2004-11-17

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and at least individual character over prior plastic-foil designs, relying in particular on EP 1 095 759.
  • Holder denied any lack of novelty or individual character, stressed visible-edge differences, and cited two earlier failed invalidity actions against the same design.
  • The Division held the patent document disclosed the prior design before the filing date and found the designer's freedom at least average in the plastic-foil sector.
  • It found only minor edge and overlap differences, insufficient to change the overall impression on the informed user, so the design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

05.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131631

vs Shenzhen Shuangzhi E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)058
000131630

vs Shenghui Wei

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)058
000122054

vs Scott Nettelton

2023-11-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)058
000105700

vs RAMTEX PRODUCTION

2019-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)058
000105701

vs RAMTEX PRODUCTION

2019-10-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)058
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)5
000132185

vs Baofeng LIU

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)5
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)5