DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008449409-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-04-03

000123415

Contested design: 008449409-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld and Registered Community design No 0084494090001 is declared invalid.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0084494090001 is declared invalid.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Yu Pengvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 28, Group 2, Zhousigong, Songjiapai Village, Jianchang Town, Nancheng County, Fuzhou City, Jiangxi Province 344000, China

Holder · RCD owner

Yanzi QIAO

China (CN)

No. 68, Tuban Village, Tuban Town, Lin County, Shanxi 033200, China

Represented by

Filippo Garbagnati

Prior art cited (1)

National design

table lamps

CN201930015404.1 · DesignView portal · disclosed 2019-08-20

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for the table lamp design, relying mainly on an earlier Chinese design registration and alleging lack of novelty and individual character.
  • The holder did not file observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of Chinese design registration No CN201930015404.1 and found the informed user would receive the same overall impression from both lamp designs.
  • The contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR, so the application was upheld and the design invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268