DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006593679-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-04-05

000123515

Contested design: 006593679-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 006593679-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Xiaoduan Livia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Xintianzhuang, Magang Village Committee, Yudian Township, Xincai County, Zhumadian City, Henan Province, China

Represented by

METIDA

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Si Nuo Xin Da Technology Co. LTDvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Rm 611, Bld B, Bantian international Center, No.5 Huancheng South Rd, Maantang Community, Bantian Dist, Shenzhen, China

Represented by

Marcella Clarke

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD2

Retevis RT388 Children's Walkie Talkie

ASIN B 00U BU8 BN2 · Amazon.de · disclosed 2015-03-06

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued that the contested walkie-talkie design lacked novelty and individual character over two earlier walkie-talkie designs, particularly Amazon-disclosed D2 from 6 March 2015.
  • Holder was invited to respond to the invalidity application but filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon listing as sufficient internet disclosure, found broad designer freedom, and considered the designs overwhelmingly similar in shape, button layout, and overall configuration.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design created the same overall impression as D2 and therefore lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

14.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130850

vs Michael AMARA

2026-04-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131224

vs Shenzhen Ruixin Fengshuo Electronic Co., Ltd

2026-03-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130970

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131064

vs Jinfeng Min

2026-02-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130524

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000129861

vs Liu yanqiong

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130564

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130565

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148