DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008818298-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-04-09

000120860

Contested design: 008818298-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008818298-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Paweł Grabińskivia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Jezioro 68, 42133 Jezioro, Poland

Represented by

Kancelaria Prawno-Patentowa

Agnieszka Suskiewicz

Holder · RCD owner

Grekpol - Paweł Papadopoulos

Poland (PL)

Zielona 4a, 63-604 Słupia pod Kępnem, Poland

Represented by

Kancelaria Patentowa

Bartłomiej Tomaszewski

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnnex 17

article showing a grey armchair and footrest offered for sale

Grekpol.pl · holder's website Grekpol.pl · disclosed 2020-07-16

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicant claimed the contested armchair and footrest design lacked novelty and individual character because the holder had disclosed it online in 2020 and similar designs had been available online since 2019.
  • The holder disputed Annex 17, arguing the date could not be linked unambiguously to the depicted armchair and that the earlier exhibits were uncertain, illegible, or insufficiently clear.
  • The Division accepted Annex 17 as a valid internet disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR, found the grace-period exception in Article 7(2) inapplicable, and treated the designer's freedom for armchairs as high.
  • Comparing the prior disclosure with the contested design, the Division found only minor differences and held that the contested design lacked individual character, so the application succeeded in full.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.0106.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068