DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015024350-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-04-10

000123574

Contested design: 015024350-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, Registered Community design No 0150243500001 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0150243500001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Tianjin Anhuilong Technology Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

Building 14, 15, Unit 2508, Haijing Wenyuan, Nanbei Street, Hexi District, Tianjin City, China

Holder · RCD owner

Henan Jinbailai Industrial Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

A171, Building 4, No. 206, West Fourth Ring Road, High-Tech Industrial Development Zone, Zhengzhou City, Henan, China

Represented by

Emilio Zeininger

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

bbq grill shown in a video snapshot

"Corten steel bbq grill" on youtube.com · YouTube · disclosed 2022-11-08

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested barbecue-grill design lacked individual character because an identical grill had already been disclosed online before filing.
  • Applicant relied on a YouTube video snapshot from 8 November 2022 and argued the designer's freedom for barbecue grills was at least average, so minor differences could not change the overall impression.
  • Holder filed no observations and did not contest disclosure or the applicant's comparison of the designs.
  • The Division accepted the YouTube disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and found the designs shared the same dominant features, with only minor differences in legs, handles, accessories, and colour contrast.
  • The contested design lacked individual character under Article 6 CDR, so the application was upheld and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberIneta GALUBICKE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131632

vs DETECTALIA EUROPE, S.L.U.

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000129741

vs 2W ORGANIC

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131788

vs Liu Xiaoxia

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131628

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131704

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131745

vs Huan Wang

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000130924

vs SOHAI HOUSEWARES CO.,LTD.

2026-04-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131546

vs Foshan Changyuansheng Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078