DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001012769-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-04-16

000121406

Contested design: 001012769-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0010127690001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

EGL Coral Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnościąvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Fabryczna 5, 05084 Leszno koło Błonia, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

Schulpen Schuim Leiden B.V.

Netherlands (NL)

Zaalbergweg 17, 2314 XS Leiden, Netherlands

Represented by

SBGK Ügyvédi Iroda

Prior art cited (2)

National design

household sponge

French design registration No 892545002 · INPI designs database; office Bulletin · disclosed 1990-03-09

Registered RCD

design in the same classification category of products as the contested design

RCD No 0009466290002 · EUIPO Register · disclosed 2008-06-26

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested sponge design lacked novelty and individual character over earlier designs disclosed before the filing date.
  • The holder said the designs created different overall impressions because the darker layer looked thinner and denser in the prior design and softer in the contested design.
  • The Division found the French design was disclosed, the designer's freedom for household sponges was at least average, and tactile material claims were irrelevant to the visual comparison.
  • Because the designs shared the same shape, two-layer composition, and very similar visual appearance, the contested design lacked individual character and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberIneta GALUBICKE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131632

vs DETECTALIA EUROPE, S.L.U.

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000129741

vs 2W ORGANIC

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131788

vs Liu Xiaoxia

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131628

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131704

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131745

vs Huan Wang

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000130924

vs SOHAI HOUSEWARES CO.,LTD.

2026-04-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131546

vs Foshan Changyuansheng Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078