Invalidity · first instance · 2024-04-18
000122294
Contested design: 002249763-0083
Outcome
The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.
Show verbatim operative text
1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 002249763-0083 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.
CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
Топ Тен EOODvia PDF extraction
Bulgaria (BG)
ul. Zhelezarska no. 9, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Represented by
Stoyan Sirakov
Holder · RCD owner
Doors Bulgaria EOODvia PDF extraction
Bulgaria (BG)
j.k. 'Pobeda', bl. 9, floor 2, app. 10, 9000 Varna, Bulgaria
Represented by
Kostadin Manev
Prior art cited (1)
Vesta Logistics EOOD brochure excerpt showing an 'MDF DOOR'
Vesta Logistics EOOD promotional brochure · disclosed 2010-05-03
Legal grounds invoked
Argument summary
- ›The applicant argued that the contested door design lacked novelty and individual character over several earlier designs, especially a door shown in a 2010 Vesta Logistics brochure.
- ›The holder disputed disclosure, dating, and proof of market availability, and argued that the compared designs created different overall impressions.
- ›The Division found the brochure reliably showed prior disclosure before the filing date and that sale to end consumers was unnecessary under Article 7(1) CDR.
- ›Given broad design freedom for door fronts, the shared wood-like finish and matching wavy vertical ornamentation created the same overall impression on the informed user.
- ›The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character, and the holder was ordered to bear the costs.
Deciding panel
- MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
- MemberNatascha GALPERIN
- MemberIvanka IVANOVA
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| deDeutsch (de) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| esespañol (es) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| frfrançais (fr) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| ititaliano (it) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| enEnglish | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Locarno classes
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 000129804 vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl | 2026-05-06 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 25 | 8 |
| 000129781 vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD. | 2026-02-09 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 25 | 8 |
| 000126955 vs Decora S.A. | 2026-01-29 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 25 | 8 |
| 000129761 vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd. | 2025-11-13 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 25 | 8 |
| 000127177 vs Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal | 2025-10-14 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 25 | 8 |
| 000129361 vs Xiaoxia LI | 2025-10-09 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 25 | 8 |
| 000129266 vs Taiyuan Jiuchangsheng Trading Co., Ltd. | 2025-10-07 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 25 | 8 |
| 000124780 vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD | 2025-06-25 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 25 | 8 |