DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006880027-0010

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-04-24

000123474

Contested design: 006880027-0010

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 006880027-0010 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Moreira’s - Comércio De Ceras LDAvia PDF extraction

Portugal (PT)

Travessa de Santo André, n.º 20, 4440426 Valongo, Portugal

Represented by

Catarina Martins de Sousa

Holder · RCD owner

José Joaquim Durães

Portugal (PT)

Rua do Seixo, n.º 229, 4860064 Arco de Baúlhe, Portugal

Represented by

Abel Dário Pinto de Oliveira

Prior art cited (10)

CatalogD1

candle

Candles No 89 · Catalogue 1991 by Plata, Poland

CatalogD2

candle

Candles No 90 · Catalogue 1991 by Plata, Poland

CatalogD3

candle

Candles No 91 · Catalogue 1991 by Plata, Poland

CatalogD4

candle

Candle No 60 LTB · Le Cere 02/2005 catalogue by Cereria Finassi

CatalogD5

candle

Candle No 60/8B · Le Cere 02/2005 catalogue by Cereria Finassi

CatalogD6

candle

Candle No 093/L · WYROBY 2013 catalogue by CER-FAR

CatalogD7

candle

Candle No 006/W · WYROBY 2013 catalogue by CER-FAR

CatalogD8

candle

Candle No 159 · WYROBY 2013 catalogue by CER-FAR

PublicationD9

candle

Candle No Rec-0140C · Leaflet Novidades 2017 by Mercado das Velas

Web disclosureD10

candle

Facebook account of Mercado das Velas · Facebook · disclosed 2016-04-15

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 7Article 5(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over ten earlier candle disclosures from catalogues, a leaflet and Facebook.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of D1 to D10 but found the contested tealight's base, grooved-and-smooth container surface and rim created a different overall impression.
  • The contested design was considered individually characterful and new, so the invalidity application was rejected and costs awarded against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberIneta GALUBICKE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.0126.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000128736

vs Senjia (Dongguan)Electronic Technology Co., LTD

2025-07-11Art 25(1)(b)267
000125015

vs Honglan YIN

2025-02-10Art 25(1)(b)267
000124516

vs YUYAO HILITE ELECTRIC CO.,LTD

2024-12-19Art 25(1)(b)267
000121816

vs AMV Technology s.r.o.

2024-07-12Art 25(1)(b)267
000121836

vs AMV Technology s.r.o.

2024-07-12Art 25(1)(b)267
000121120

vs DELTA LIGHT NV

2024-06-18Art 25(1)(b)267
000121119

vs DELTA LIGHT NV

2024-06-13Art 25(1)(b)267
000120900

vs DELTA LIGHT NV

2024-06-10Art 25(1)(b)267