DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015020001-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-05-07

000121776

Contested design: 015020001-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; Registered Community design No 015020001-0001 is declared invalid.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 015020001-0001 is declared invalid.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Ihor Zhukvia PDF extraction

UA

vul. Promyslova, 26E, smt. Shidnytsia 82391, Ukraine

Represented by

Jazz. Legal BV

Thierry Van Ransbeeck

Holder · RCD owner

Shaman Inventions

LV

Kaļķu iela 12, Cēsis, 4101, Latvia

Represented by

Patent Agency Kdk

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureannex C

Instagram post showing the 'LELEKA' / 'Architoyz' children's stepladder design

Instagram · disclosed 2022-07-19

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested children's stepladder lacked novelty and individual character over the earlier LELEKA / Architoyz design disclosed on Instagram before the filing date.
  • Holder challenged disclosure, stressed safety-driven technical constraints, and argued differences such as triangular supports, dimensions, fastening details, and folded appearance created a different overall impression.
  • The Division accepted annex C as a valid internet disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR, found the designer's freedom at least average, and treated the claimed differences as insufficient to change the overall impression.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Articles 4(1) and 6(1)(b) CDR.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000127177

vs Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129361

vs Xiaoxia LI

2025-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129266

vs Taiyuan Jiuchangsheng Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000124780

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258