DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009017999-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-05-22

000123999

Contested design: 009017999-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 009017999-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Wolfgangs GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Rathausstr. 21, 68519 Viernheim, Germany

Represented by

Lexea Rechtsanwälte

Holder · RCD owner

Cuiling Luo

China (CN)

Room 110, No. 3888, Nanshan Avenue, Nanshan District, Shenzhen City, Guangdong 518000 China

Represented by

Michele Carella

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

pepper grinder

ASIN No B 09C 4L9 91F · Amazon.de · disclosed 2021-08-08

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested pepper grinder design lacked novelty and individual character because nearly identical products had been sold internationally before the filing date.
  • As evidence, the applicant relied on an Amazon.de listing for a pepper grinder with ASIN B 09C 4L9 91F shown as available since 8 August 2021.
  • The holder filed no observations, and the Division accepted the Amazon listing as sufficient internet disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR before 6 May 2022.
  • Given the designer's broad freedom, the minor colour and detail differences did not change the overall impression, so the design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131632

vs DETECTALIA EUROPE, S.L.U.

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000129741

vs 2W ORGANIC

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131788

vs Liu Xiaoxia

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131628

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131704

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131745

vs Huan Wang

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000130924

vs SOHAI HOUSEWARES CO.,LTD.

2026-04-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131546

vs Foshan Changyuansheng Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078