DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008352405-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-05-28

000123280

Contested design: 008352405-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 008352405-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Hecta Viticol SRLvia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

Sat Poșta Câlnău, camera 7, Clădire C9, jud. Buzău, Comuna Poșta Câlnău, Romania

Represented by

Elena Grecu

Holder · RCD owner

Emanuel-Corneliu Dobronăuțeanuvia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

Int. Bitolia nr.28, Bucuresti, Romania

Prior art cited (1)

Trade mark

Figurative Romanian trade mark featuring the verbal element "UNIREA" for alcoholic beverages (except beer)

Romanian trade mark registration No 109 325 (fig.) · OSIM / TMview · disclosed 2010-09-28

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(e)Article 10(2)(b)Article 9(2)(b)

Argument summary

  • The applicants relied on earlier Romanian trade mark registration No 109 325 and argued the contested tag design reproduced its distinctive UNIREA sign for alcoholic beverages, creating a likelihood of confusion in Romania.
  • They said tags for alcoholic beverages are at least similar, and effectively complementary, to alcoholic beverages in Class 33 because such goods are sold with labels or tags.
  • The holder filed no observations. The Division found the design used the earlier sign, the goods were similar, the signs were visually, aurally and conceptually highly similar, and the earlier mark had normal distinctiveness.
  • The Division held that Article 25(1)(e) CDR was satisfied because the applicants could prohibit the sign’s use, so the contested design was declared invalid and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberIneta GALUBICKE
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

19.08

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000123281

vs EMANUEL-CORNELIU DOBRONĂUȚEANU

2024-05-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)198
000010791

vs QUESOS CAMPO LATINO, S.L.

2018-10-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)198
000010789

vs QUESOS CAMPO LATINO, S.L.

2018-10-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)198
000131384

vs Ningbo Yinzhou Wowo International Trade Co., Ltd.

2026-03-13REUD invalidated196
000131626

vs Ningbo Yinzhou Wowo International Trade Co., Ltd.

2026-03-13REUD invalidated196
000130967

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-12REUD invalidated196
000127580

vs JADWIGA ŁOWKIEWICZ

2025-10-22REUD invalidated196
000129366

vs FHU Jarosław Wolski

2025-10-16REUD invalidated196