DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015091267-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-02-12

000130967

Contested design: 015091267-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 720 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 0150912670001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shenzhen Langmi Technology Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Shenzhen, China

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

Represented by

Metida

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

'Meidu Black Hair Dye' shampoo packaging shown in a customer review

https://www.amazon.com · Amazon · disclosed 2023-01-06

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested product-label design lacked novelty and individual character because an identical shampoo packaging design had been publicly disclosed on Amazon before the filing date.
  • It relied on Amazon review materials showing the marketed packaging and said those online materials were publicly accessible to both the specialised sector and the general public.
  • The holder was invited to respond but filed no observations, so the applicant's disclosure evidence was unrebutted.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon review printout as sufficient web disclosure under Article 7(1), found the compared designs differed only in immaterial details, and declared the contested design invalid for lack of novelty.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberDimitrios ANDRIANOPOULOS
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

19.08

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131626

vs Ningbo Yinzhou Wowo International Trade Co., Ltd.

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000131384

vs Ningbo Yinzhou Wowo International Trade Co., Ltd.

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000127580

vs JADWIGA ŁOWKIEWICZ

2025-10-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000129366

vs FHU Jarosław Wolski

2025-10-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000129423

vs AFFARGO LTD

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000128919

vs Shenzhen Langmi Technology Co., Ltd

2025-07-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000126063

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000126034

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198