DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002704445-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-10-16

000129366

Contested design: 002704445-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested registered EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 0027044450001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Nurdim Bumedien Mohamedivia PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Melilla, Spain

Represented by

Padima

Holder · RCD owner

FHU Jarosław Wolski

Poland (PL)

Koszalin, Poland

Represented by

Kancelaria Patentowa Aneta Balwierz-Michalska

Aneta Balwierz-Michalska

Prior art cited (1)

Trade mark

label design depicted in the Spanish trade mark application

Spanish trade mark application No M 30 389 70(4) · Spanish Trademark and Patent Office online database · disclosed 2012-08-01

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character and also invoked an earlier-right ground, relying on a published Spanish trade mark application for a label design.
  • The holder was invited to respond to the invalidity application but filed no observations.
  • The Division found the 2012 publication of the Spanish trade mark application was a valid prior disclosure and could be relied on as a prior design under Article 7(1).
  • Given the broad design freedom for labels, the shared layout and graphic elements outweighed minor differences in stripe width, curved lines, and colour.
  • The contested design lacked individual character, so the application was upheld, the design was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberDimitrios ANDRIANOPOULOS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

19.08

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131384

vs Ningbo Yinzhou Wowo International Trade Co., Ltd.

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000131626

vs Ningbo Yinzhou Wowo International Trade Co., Ltd.

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000130967

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000127580

vs JADWIGA ŁOWKIEWICZ

2025-10-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000129423

vs AFFARGO LTD

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000128919

vs Shenzhen Langmi Technology Co., Ltd

2025-07-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000126063

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000126034

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198