DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009147242-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-05-29

000124001

Contested design: 009147242-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0091472420001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

CCLIFE Technic GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Barentsstraße 15, 53881 Euskirchen, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

FDS GmbH

Germany (DE)

Neuer Höltigbaum 36, 22143 Hamburg, Germany

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Amazon offer for a climbing frame called 'COSTWAY Kletterdreieck'

ASIN B08 D9G 86MX · Amazon.de · disclosed 2020-07-19

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on an earlier climbing-frame design disclosed online before the contested filing date.
  • The applicant relied on Amazon.de printouts showing a 'COSTWAY Kletterdreieck' offer with ASIN B08 D9G 86MX available since 19/07/2020.
  • The holder filed no observations, and the Division accepted the Amazon listing as sufficient disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR.
  • The Division found the prior and contested designs differed only in an immaterial detail, so the contested design lacked novelty and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218