DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008828867-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-05-30

000121975

Contested design: 008828867-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld, the contested Community design No. 008828867-0001 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 008828867-0001 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Henan Kaibeide Industrial Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 69, Unit 1, Building 1, No. 41, Jinsuo Road, High-tech Industrial Development Zone, Zhengzhou 450001, China

Represented by

METIDA

Holder · RCD owner

Ziel Home Furnishing Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

No. 198-19 Songshan South Road, Dongfang Building 6F, Suite 601, Erqi District, Zhengzhou City, Zhengzhou 450015, China

Represented by

Euziel International GmbH

Yi Kong

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

osoltus Bali Bamboo Wood Laundry Basket Laundry Collector 75cm Brown Taupe

ASIN B07WH5ZPDJ · amazon.de · disclosed 2019-09-02

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on earlier disclosure of a substantially identical laundry basket design.
  • The holder disputed the Amazon disclosure date, argued the product images could have changed over time, and maintained the contested design created a different overall impression.
  • The Division accepted Amazon evidence supported by a 2019 customer review, found no proven market saturation, and held the designer's freedom was not materially restricted.
  • The contested design produced the same overall impression as D1, so it lacked individual character and was declared invalid in full.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.07

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131632

vs DETECTALIA EUROPE, S.L.U.

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000129741

vs 2W ORGANIC

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131788

vs Liu Xiaoxia

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131628

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131704

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131745

vs Huan Wang

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000130924

vs SOHAI HOUSEWARES CO.,LTD.

2026-04-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131546

vs Foshan Changyuansheng Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078