DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015019759-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-05-30

000122096

Contested design: 015019759-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0150197590002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Dambat Jastrzębski Spółka komandytowo-akcyjnavia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Adamów 50, 05825 Grodzisk Mazowiecki, Poland

Represented by

Helena Beata Gajek

Holder · RCD owner

Firma Handlowa IN-HOME Justyna Siudek

Poland (PL)

Tczewska 1, 86170 Nowe, Poland

Represented by

Patentbox Kancelaria Patentowa

Romuald Suszczewicz

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

pumps for liquids

Community design No 0089274790001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2022-06-22

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on its earlier RCD No 0089274790001 and also mentioned technical-function concerns.
  • The holder argued the earlier design had been misrepresented, the contested design remained new and individually distinctive, and functional constraints plus a crowded sector made minor differences significant.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier RCD through its bulletin publication, found designer freedom for liquid pumps not considerably limited, and rejected the holder's market-saturation argument for lack of evidence.
  • Comparing the overall appearance, the Division held the differences in colour, label, and cable component did not alter the same overall impression, so the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

15.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132204

vs Baofeng LIU

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000132185

vs Baofeng LIU

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000132064

vs Han Sheng

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131827

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131826

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131787

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131088

vs ZhiAo Zhou

2026-03-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000129841

vs Suzhou Kingbow Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd

2026-01-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158