DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008148050-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-06-05

000123735

Contested design: 008148050-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008148050-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Huaxian Zhangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

C806, Longtaixuan, No. 48, Nanguang Commercial Street, Nanshan District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Chebotong Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

5C,5F ,Bldg 2, Phase II, Peninsula Chengbang Garden, Jinshiji Rd, Dongjiaotou, Shekou st., Nanshan Dist., Shenzhen, China

Represented by

Ipside

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

offer for the “Original Launch EasyDiag for iOS Android Built-in Bluetooth OBDII Generic Code Reader”

www.obdexpress.co.uk · www.obdexpress.co.uk

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested car diagnostic scanner lacked novelty and individual character because prior designs had been disclosed online before 27/08/2020.
  • The holder contested disclosure and argued that differences in body width, belt colour, side details, and front buttons created a different overall impression.
  • The Division accepted the website evidence as prior disclosure, found only limited technical constraints, and treated the functional front-button details as non-decisive for overall impression.
  • It concluded that the contested design created the same overall impression as the prior design and declared the RCD invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberChiara BORACE
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

14.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130850

vs Michael AMARA

2026-04-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131224

vs Shenzhen Ruixin Fengshuo Electronic Co., Ltd

2026-03-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130970

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131064

vs Jinfeng Min

2026-02-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130524

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000129861

vs Liu yanqiong

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130564

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130565

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148