DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015003472-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-06-18

000121614

Contested design: 015003472-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 015003472-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

LEGO Juris A/Svia PDF extraction

Denmark (DK)

Koldingvej 2, 7190 Billund, Denmark

Represented by

Bomhard IP, S.L.

Holder · RCD owner

Guangdong Loongon Animation & Culture Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

East of Ning Chuan Bei Road, North of Deng Feng Road Xin Shi District, Shantou, Guangdong, China

Prior art cited (1)

National design

toy figurine

CN 303806688 S · Chinese design patent publication; EUIPO DesignView · disclosed 2016-08-17

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 8(1)Article 8(2)Article 8(3)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested toy figurine reproduced Chinese design patent No CN 303806688 S, disclosed in 2016, so it lacked novelty and at least individual character.
  • The holder challenged disclosure, image quality, and translation, and argued a crowded toy-figurine sector, interoperability constraints, and visual differences created a different overall impression.
  • The Division accepted disclosure through the Chinese patent publication and DesignView extract, and rejected the claimed Article 8 exclusions and the alleged saturation of the relevant market.
  • Taking account of the informed user and high designer freedom, the Division found the designs overwhelmingly similar; differences such as hair, back curve, and base circles did not alter the overall impression.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid in full, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218