DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009180383-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-06-18

000123476

Contested design: 009180383-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 009180383-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Benno Klosvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Nelkenstraße 15, 85591 Vaterstetten, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Shanghai Dumo Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Building 8, No. 8188, Daye Highway, Fengxian District, Shanghai, China

Represented by

Jörg Brettschneider

Prior art cited (1)

National designD1

machine chisel

German design No. 40 2015 101 188-00030 · German Designs bulletin · disclosed 2015-12-24

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying inter alia on earlier German design D1 as an almost identical prior design.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found D1 had been validly disclosed before the filing date and that differences in shaft details and finish did not alter the overall impression on the informed user.
  • The contested design lacked individual character under Article 6 CDR, so the application was upheld and the design declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

15.09

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132185

vs Baofeng LIU

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000132204

vs Baofeng LIU

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000132064

vs Han Sheng

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131827

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131826

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131787

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131088

vs ZhiAo Zhou

2026-03-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000129841

vs Suzhou Kingbow Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd

2026-01-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158