DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009180383-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-06-18

000123494

Contested design: 009180383-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 009180383-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Benno Klosvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Nelkenstraße 15, 85591 Vaterstetten, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Shanghai Dumo Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Building 8, No. 8188, Daye Highway, Fengxian District, Shanghai, China

Represented by

Jörg Brettschneider

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

flintronic SDS-Plus machine chisel offered on Amazon

ASIN B 07S SR9 5CM · Amazon (amazon.de) · disclosed 2019-06-10

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested machine chisel design lacked novelty and individual character over earlier disclosures, relying in particular on Amazon listing D1 dated 10/06/2019.
  • The holder was invited to respond to the invalidity application but filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon listing as prior disclosure and found both designs shared the same overall shape, with only minor differences insufficient to alter the informed user's overall impression.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6 CDR and was declared invalid in full.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

15.09

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132185

vs Baofeng LIU

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000132204

vs Baofeng LIU

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000132064

vs Han Sheng

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131827

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131826

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131787

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131088

vs ZhiAo Zhou

2026-03-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000129841

vs Suzhou Kingbow Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd

2026-01-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158