DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008322796-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-06-20

000124435

Contested design: 008322796-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008322796-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Weifen HUvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 88, Zhaoxu Village North, Huyuan Township, Lishui City, Jinyun County, Zhejiang Province, China

Represented by

Konstantin Tahtadjiev

Holder · RCD owner

Wuyi Yunlin Steel Products CO., LTDvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

107 opposite side of Lengshuikeng Village, Shuxi Subdistrict, Wuyi County, Jinhua City, Zhejiang Province 321200, China

Represented by

Metida

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD2

songmics post box, lockable wall-mounted letter box with newspaper compartment

ASIN B07WD7RPJF · Amazon.de · disclosed 2019-11-10

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested letter-box design lacked individual character over prior design D2, a Songmics post box disclosed on Amazon before the filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon screenshots and customer-review dates as sufficient internet disclosure evidence under Article 7 CDR.
  • Given high designer freedom and near-identity in the designs’ essential features, the contested design produced the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld and the contested design was declared invalid in full, with costs awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberChiara BORACE
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000127177

vs Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129361

vs Xiaoxia LI

2025-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129266

vs Taiyuan Jiuchangsheng Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000124780

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258