DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015001695-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-06-27

000124175

Contested design: 015001695-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 015001695-0003 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Amazing Brands IV UG (haftungsbeschränkt)via PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Im Mediapark 5, D-50670 Cologne Germany

Represented by

Lexea Rechtsanwälte

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Yixiang e-commerce Co., Ltd

China (CN)

406, building B, getailong complex building, No. 227 Bulong Road, Ma'antang community, Bantian street, Longgang District, Shenzhen, Guangdong China

Represented by

Metida

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

bathroom shelves [except furniture]

RCD No 009182165-0005 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2022-10-05

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier RCD No 009182165-0005 for bathroom shelves.
  • Holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division treated publication of the earlier RCD in the Community Designs Bulletin before the filing date as sufficient disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR.
  • Given the designer's broad freedom, the similarities dominated the minor differences, so the contested design created the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld and the contested design was declared invalid, with costs awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberChiara BORACE
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068