DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009059231-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-06-28

000124417

Contested design: 009059231-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, Registered Community design No 0090592310001 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0090592310001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shunjian Luvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 11, Yong’an West 1st Street, Xinming Village, Leliu Street, Shunde District, Foshan, Guangdong, China

Holder · RCD owner

Jiangsu Yichu Brand Management Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Bldg. 1, the factory bldg. construction project of Huasong Ind. Park, Binhai County, Yancheng City, Jiangsu Province, China

Prior art cited (1)

Patent

air fryer

CN 306147140 S · China · disclosed 2020-11-03

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character over earlier Chinese design patent CN 306147140 S for an air fryer and also invoked lack of novelty.
  • The holder filed no observations and did not contest disclosure of the earlier Chinese design patent or the applicant's comparison.
  • The Division found the earlier patent had been disclosed before the contested priority date, the informed user was a purchaser familiar with air fryers, and designer freedom was at least average.
  • It held the shared rectangular body, rounded corners, handle placement and upper protrusions dominated the overall impression, while the identified differences were minor and insufficient.
  • The contested design therefore lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR, so the application was upheld and the RCD declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131632

vs DETECTALIA EUROPE, S.L.U.

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000129741

vs 2W ORGANIC

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131788

vs Liu Xiaoxia

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131628

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131704

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131745

vs Huan Wang

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000130924

vs SOHAI HOUSEWARES CO.,LTD.

2026-04-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131546

vs Foshan Changyuansheng Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078