DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007874193-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-07-02

000124457

Contested design: 007874193-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 007874193-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Baifeng Shenvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No.17 Shencai House, Wucheyan Village, Huangjiabu Town, Yuyao City, Zhejiang Province, China

Represented by

Tong Yang SLU

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Nanxin Ttechnology Limitedvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

605, No. 5 Xiangzhao Building, Longping Community, Dalang St., Longhua Dist., Shenzhen, Guangdong China

Represented by

Marcella Clarke

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

Light projectors, Projector lamps

RCD No 007799820-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2020-04-15

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on an earlier published RCD said to match the contested design in all material features.
  • The holder was invited to respond but filed no observations, so the application was effectively undefended.
  • The Division found the earlier RCD had been validly disclosed before the filing date and that both designs created the same overall impression on the informed user despite a slight shade difference.
  • The contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b), so the application was upheld and the design was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268