DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008687073-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-07-12

000123054

Contested design: 008687073-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0086870730001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Industrias Lotu, S.A.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Polígono Industrial Landaben, c/a, 31012 Pamplona (Navarra) Spain

Holder · RCD owner

Fercomacess, Lda.via PDF extraction

Portugal (PT)

Rua da Liberdade, n.º 135, P3750791 Trofa, Portugal

Represented by

Miguel Alexandre de Oliveira Soares Fernandes

Prior art cited (1)

CatalogDocument 1

IFS catalogue disclosure of pivot M6 x 45mm / pivot M6 x 47mm

codes 30100645 and 30100647 · IFS – Industrial Fastening Solutions 2011 catalogue

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 6(2)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicants sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, invisibility in normal use, and features allegedly dictated solely by technical function.
  • The holder argued the design was an innovative anti-vibration pivot with distinctive features and said the applicants were selling copies already challenged in Portuguese court proceedings.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the 2011 IFS catalogue design, found designer freedom limited, and held the prior and contested designs created the same overall impression.
  • The application was upheld on Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6, so the contested design was declared invalid without examining the remaining grounds.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000127177

vs Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129361

vs Xiaoxia LI

2025-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129266

vs Taiyuan Jiuchangsheng Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000124780

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258