Invalidity · first instance · 2024-07-15
000124796
Contested design: 006269254-0001
Outcome
The invalidity application is rejected as inadmissible, and the invalidity fee will not be refunded.
Show verbatim operative text
1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected as inadmissible. 2. The fee for the application for a declaration of invalidity will not be refunded.
CostsNo costs order
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
Ahad Sader Fosalaievia PDF extraction
Germany (DE)
c/o Niboline GmbH, Südstr.6, 16356 Werneuchen, Germany
Holder · RCD owner
Reapow Technology Co.,Limitedvia PDF extraction
Hong Kong (HK)
Unit 2508a 25/F Bank Of America Tower 12 Harcourt Rd Central, Hong Kong, 999077 Hong Kong
Legal grounds invoked
Argument summary
- ›The applicant sought invalidity of Community design No 006269254-0001 under Article 25(1)(b) CDR in conjunction with Article 4(1) CDR.
- ›The holder filed no observations recorded in the decision because the case was resolved on admissibility before any merits assessment.
- ›The Division found the required reasoned statement of facts, evidence and arguments had been filed in German instead of the language of proceedings, English, and the deficiency was not remedied in time.
- ›The application was rejected as inadmissible and the invalidity fee was not refunded.
Deciding panel
- MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
- MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
- MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| deDeutsch (de) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| esespañol (es) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| frfrançais (fr) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| ititaliano (it) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| enEnglish | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Locarno classes
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 000129481 vs Oro-Kong GmbH | 2026-05-27 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 07 | 7 |
| 000129482 vs Oro-Kong GmbH | 2026-05-26 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 07 | 7 |
| 000129501 vs Oro-Kong GmbH | 2026-05-26 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 07 | 7 |
| 000129502 vs Oro-Kong GmbH | 2026-05-26 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 07 | 7 |
| 000129483 vs Oro-Kong GmbH | 2026-05-26 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 07 | 7 |
| 000129484 vs Oro-Kong GmbH | 2026-05-26 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 07 | 7 |
| 000129503 vs Oro-Kong GmbH | 2026-05-26 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 07 | 7 |
| 000130704 vs Shenzhen Yisi Technology Co., Ltd. | 2026-05-22 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 07 | 7 |