DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015103665-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-05-22

000130704

Contested design: 015103665-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered EU design No 015103665-0001 is rejected.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered EU design No 015103665-0001 is rejected.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

He Fengvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Ningbo, Yinzhou District, China

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Yisi Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

ShenZhen, Guangdong, China

Represented by

Yanyun Zhang

Prior art cited (3)

Web disclosureprior design 1

bread basket with lid and liner shown in Amazon listing

Amazon ASIN B0DF CVX TPW · Amazon · disclosed 2024-10-11

Web disclosureprior design 2

open braided rope bread basket shown in Amazon listing

Amazon ASIN B0DF CVX TPW · Amazon · disclosed 2024-10-11

Otherprior design 3⚠ rejected as evidence

image submitted within the applicant's observations

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested bread basket lacked novelty and individual character in light of earlier Amazon-disclosed rope baskets and that the 12-month grace period did not apply.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted the Amazon printout as proof of disclosure for prior designs 1 and 2, rejected prior design 3 as insufficiently evidenced, and found broad designer freedom in the bread-basket sector.
  • Despite some shared features, the Division found the contested design created a different overall impression and was not identical to the invoked prior designs.
  • The invalidity application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to pay the holder's fixed representation costs of EUR 400.

Deciding panel

  • MemberGailé SAKALAITE-ORLOVSKIENE
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129481

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-27Art 25(1)(b)077
000129484

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129502

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129482

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129503

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129483

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129501

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000131705

vs DETECTALIA EUROPE, S.L.U.

2026-05-14Art 25(1)(b)077