DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015076725-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-05-14

000131705

Contested design: 015076725-0003

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity against EU design No. 015076725-0003 is rejected, and the applicant is ordered to pay the holder’s costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

1. Se desestima la solicitud de declaración de nulidad del diseño de la UE registrado n.º 015076725-0003. 2. Se condena al solicitante a que sufrague las costas del titular, fijadas en 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Liyun Qianvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Holder · RCD owner

Detectalia Europe, S.L.U.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Monóvar, España

Represented by

Cristina Giner Mas

Prior art cited (3)

Registered RCDdiseño anterior 1

bandejas para hornear

015011553-0001 · Boletín de Diseños de la Unión Europea · disclosed 2023-03-06

Registered RCDdiseño anterior 2

recipientes para enhornar

008937502-0001 · Boletín de Diseños de la Unión Europea · disclosed 2022-04-29

Web disclosurediseño anterior 3

diseño de papel para hornear ofrecido a la venta en Amazon

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09QX8TY1X/ (ASIN B09QX8TY1X) · Amazon via Internet Archive · disclosed 2022-01-21

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character and argued that the design’s features were dictated exclusively by technical function.
  • The applicant relied on two earlier EU design registrations and an Amazon/Internet Archive disclosure; the holder filed no observations.
  • The Division found no proof that all visible features were exclusively technically dictated and considered the designer’s freedom at least medium.
  • Compared with each earlier design, the contested design created a different overall impression and was not identical, so the invalidity grounds failed.
  • The invalidity application was dismissed and the applicant was ordered to reimburse the holder’s costs of EUR 400.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ
  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129481

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-27Art 25(1)(b)077
000129484

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129502

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129482

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129503

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129483

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000129501

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b)077
000130704

vs Shenzhen Yisi Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-22Art 25(1)(b)077