DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001116347-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-08-09

000121654

Contested design: 001116347-0001

CDR

Outcome

Discontinued / withdrawn

The invalidity proceedings are terminated without a decision on the merits, and each party shall bear its own costs.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

Se pone fin al procedimiento de nulidad sin una resolución sobre el fondo. 2. Cada parte sufragará sus propias costas.

CostsEach party bears its own costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Leds-C4, S.A.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Carretera de Rubi, 88, Planta 2, local A1, 08174 Sant Cugat del Valles (Barcelona), España

Represented by

March & Asociados

Holder · RCD owner

Marset Iluminación, S.A.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

C. d'Alfons XII, 429-431, 08918 Badalona, España

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(a)Article 3Article 25(1)(b)Article 6

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity because the contested RCD's views were allegedly contradictory and the design was not clearly defined under Article 25(1)(a) and Article 3 CDR.
  • The holder requested a partial surrender deleting the challenged views, denied accepting the invalidity claims, and objected that a later-added Article 25(1)(b) ground was out of time.
  • After the Office recorded the partial surrender, the Division found the original contradiction complaint had lost its object and asked the applicant to show a legal interest in a merits decision.
  • The applicant did not respond, so the Division closed the case without a merits decision and treated the late-added lack-of-individual-character ground as inadmissible.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000119619

vs XAL GmbH

2026-04-15Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a)269
000119620

vs XAL GmbH

2026-04-15Art 25(1)(b)267
000119599

vs XAL GmbH

2026-04-15Art 25(1)(b)267
000131624

vs NOVOWISE LTD

2026-03-27Art 25(1)(b)267
000128957

vs Signify Holding B.V.

2026-03-09Art 25(1)(a)267
000128635

vs Signify Holding B.V.

2026-03-06Art 25(1)(a)267
000130242

vs DMUSEUM Inc.

2026-03-05Art 25(1)(b)267
000130762

vs TURISPORT, S.L.

2026-02-24Art 25(1)(b)267