DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008772784-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-02-24

000130762

Contested design: 008772784-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity against EU design No 008772784-0001 is dismissed, and the applicant is ordered to pay the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

1. Se desestima la solicitud de declaración de nulidad del diseño de la UE registrado n.º 008772784-0001. 2. Se condena al solicitante a que sufrague las costas del titular, fijadas en 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Willem Albert de Witvia PDF extraction

Netherlands (NL)

Schagen, Países Bajos

Represented by

Elzaburu, S.L.P.

Holder · RCD owner

Turisport, S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Montmeló. Barcelona, España

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

signalling apparatus and device

RCD No 006312740-0002 · EUIPO eSearch database · disclosed 2019-03-28

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 5(2)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier RCD No 006312740-0002, arguing the differences were only minor details.
  • The holder filed no observations despite being invited to respond.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier RCD, identified the informed user as a user of vehicle beacons, and found the designer's freedom relatively broad.
  • It held the contested design created a different overall impression and was not identical to the earlier design, so the invalidity ground under Article 25(1)(b) failed.
  • The invalidity application was dismissed and the applicant was ordered to pay EUR 400 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberCarmen SÁNCHEZ PALOMARES
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000119620

vs XAL GmbH

2026-04-15Art 25(1)(b)267
000119599

vs XAL GmbH

2026-04-15Art 25(1)(b)267
000119619

vs XAL GmbH

2026-04-15Art 25(1)(b)267
000131624

vs NOVOWISE LTD

2026-03-27Art 25(1)(b)267
000130242

vs DMUSEUM Inc.

2026-03-05Art 25(1)(b)267
000127916

vs Volvo Car Corporation

2026-02-11Art 25(1)(b)267
000128875

vs YUYAO HILITE ELECTRIC CO.,LTD

2025-11-03Art 25(1)(b)267
000126376

vs deluxe holding ApS

2025-10-06Art 25(1)(b)267