DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007386313-0008

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-08-14

000125299

Contested design: 007386313-0008

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 007386313-0008 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shenzhen Jiexunda Technology Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 402, Unit 3, Building 11, Daxin Garden, Zhonghuan Rd., Longhua St., Longhua Dist., Shenzhen, China

Represented by

André Guerreiro Rodrigues

Holder · RCD owner

Guangxi Nanning Ranbi Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

No. 701, Unit 2 Building 2, Xiping Bridge, No. 64 Xinyang Road, Xixiangtang District, Nanning City, China

Represented by

Sach & Associates

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

beginner set of 124 pieces with randomly packed colours

ASIN B09DKKMXXF · Amazon.it · disclosed 2017-10-17

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested toy building-block set lacked novelty and individual character because similar products had been sold on Amazon before the filing date.
  • Applicant relied on an Amazon.it listing for a 124-piece beginner set, first available on 17 October 2017, as evidence of prior disclosure.
  • Holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the Amazon listing sufficiently proved disclosure and held that the contested design created the same overall impression as the prior design, so it lacked individual character.
  • The invalidity application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218