DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002827675-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-08-23

000122835

Contested design: 002827675-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 002827675-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Schäfer Brand Distribution GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Industriestraße 28, 56307 Daufenbach, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Travel Blue Limited

United Kingdom (GB)

Suite 13 Building 6 Croxley Park Hatters Lane, Watford, Middlesex WD18 8YH, United Kingdom

Prior art cited (2)

PatentD1

travel pillow

US D522,300 S · United States design patent · disclosed 2006-06-06

Web disclosureD2

Cabeau Evolution Pillow travel pillow with portable bag

https://www.amazon.de; ASIN B004ZIDXK2 · Amazon.de · disclosed 2012-11-14

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 5(2)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over D1 and D2, arguing the standard neck-pillow form left only minor differences and the storage compartment did not change the overall impression.
  • Holder argued D1 and D2 differed materially in contours, side walls, closures, and storage features, so neither prior design created the same overall impression as the contested design.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of D1 and D2 but treated later-invoked D3-D10 material as inadmissible because it expanded the subject matter beyond the application filed.
  • The Division found the shared semicircular form was standard for neck pillows, while the contour, zipper, bag, pocket, and closure differences were significant; the design remained novel and had individual character, so the application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberChiara BORACE
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.0106.09

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000128575

vs Travel Blue Limited

2025-07-31Art 25(1)(b)06, 0310
000128557

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19Art 25(1)(b)067
000128656

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19Art 25(1)(b)067
000129371

vs joboo GmbH

2026-05-05Art 25(1)(b)067
000128978

vs Franco Ferri S.R.L.

2026-04-13Art 25(1)(b)067
000131627

vs Shuifa XIE

2026-03-31Art 25(1)(b)067
000130974

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10Art 25(1)(b)067
000128937

vs Liyou Industrial Co., Ltd

2026-02-24Art 25(1)(b)067