DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009074172-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-02-24

000128937

Contested design: 009074172-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered EU design No 009074172-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Gonge Creative Learning ApSvia PDF extraction

Denmark (DK)

Them, Denmark

Represented by

Patrade a/s

Holder · RCD owner

Liyou Industrial Co., Ltd

China (CN)

Wenzhou City, Zhejiang, China

Represented by

Agency Arnopatents

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

apparatus for physical exercise control

EU design registration No 002418848-0002 · EU Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2014-03-11

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier EU design registration No 002418848-0002.
  • The holder argued the compared products and informed users differ and that the designs have clear visual differences, with many alleged similarities being functional or commonplace.
  • The Division found the prior design had been disclosed, identified a broad degree of designer freedom, and assessed the informed user as a person familiar with baby toys and children's seats.
  • It held that the contested fish-shaped seat created a different overall impression from the earlier round design, so the design had individual character and was not identical.
  • The invalidity application was rejected, and the applicant was ordered to pay the holder's representation costs of EUR 400.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberChiara BORACE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.0121.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129371

vs joboo GmbH

2026-05-05Art 25(1)(b)21, 0610
0001081642020-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)21, 068
000106859

vs YONG CHEN

2019-10-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)21, 068
000101959

vs Matthew Bembridge

2018-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)21, 068
000130341

vs Mortensen Software Consulting ApS

2026-05-27Art 25(1)(b)217
000128656

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19Art 25(1)(b)067
000128557

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19Art 25(1)(b)067
000129621

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29Art 25(1)(b)217