DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009184435-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-09-02

000122475

Contested design: 009184435-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 009184435-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Design4u ASvia PDF extraction

Norway (NO)

Grini næringspark 12, 1361 Østerås, Norway

Holder · RCD owner

Przedsiębiorstwo Produkcyjno – Handlowo - Usługowe ‘ANDERS’ Export – Import Setla Wiesławvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Węglowa 21, 34-300 Żywiec Poland

Represented by

Anna Bożek-Mozgała

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnnex A4/A11

RTV cabinet 'Air med STOFFDØR' shown in Facebook posts

https://www.facebook.com · Facebook

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested RTV cabinet lacked novelty because it was identical to its earlier “Air med STOFFDØR” cabinet disclosed on Facebook before the filing date.
  • Holder argued its design differed through a rear cable-opening solution relevant to audiovisual cabinets and therefore produced a different appearance.
  • The Division accepted the Facebook posts as prior disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and found the rear cavity an immaterial detail with minimal visual impact.
  • Because the compared cabinets were materially identical, the contested design lacked novelty and the invalidity application was upheld in full.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068