DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002089482-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-09-02

000125075

Contested design: 002089482-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0020894820001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Stiegelmeyer GmbH & Co. KGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Ackerstraße 42, 32051 Herford, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Linet spol. s r.o.via PDF extraction

Czechia (CZ)

Zelevcice 5, 27401 Slany, Czechia

Prior art cited (2)

Registered RCDD1

hospital bed

RCD No 009082560002 · Community design Register · disclosed 2008-04-18

Registered RCDD2

hospital bed

RCD No 0011051180003 · Community design Register · disclosed 2009-04-16

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 67Article 6(1)Article 7Article 5(1)(b)Article 5(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier RCDs D1 and D2 for hospital beds.
  • The holder filed no timely defence, then requested restitutio in integrum, blaming missed deadline alerts during an internal system migration and alleged lack of database publication.
  • The Division found the restitutio request admissible but unsubstantiated because the holder did not prove all due care or any Office error about design-database correspondence details.
  • On the merits, the Division held the contested design created a different overall impression from D1 and D2 and was therefore new and had individual character.
  • The invalidity application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to pay EUR 400 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000128656

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19Art 25(1)(b)067
000128557

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19Art 25(1)(b)067
000129371

vs joboo GmbH

2026-05-05Art 25(1)(b)067
000128978

vs Franco Ferri S.R.L.

2026-04-13Art 25(1)(b)067
000131627

vs Shuifa XIE

2026-03-31Art 25(1)(b)067
000130974

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10Art 25(1)(b)067
000128937

vs Liyou Industrial Co., Ltd

2026-02-24Art 25(1)(b)067
000128579

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-02-23Art 25(1)(b)067