DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008664064-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-09-09

000122894

Contested design: 008664064-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0086640640001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Urban Factory Ltdvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

Oceana House First Floor, 39-49 Commercial Road, Southampton, Hampshire SO15 1GA, United Kingdom

Represented by

Christel van den Reek

Holder · RCD owner

Yaoqiang Zheng

China (CN)

2-16, Xintian Village, Lidian Town, Anlu City, Hubei Province, China

Represented by

Jörg Brettschneider

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosure

Beaumont DF225 Boston Cocktail Shaker

ASIN B07 6MG Y9C5 · amazon.de · disclosed 2015-09-26

Web disclosure

Beaumont DF225 Boston Cocktail Shaker

ASIN B07 6MG Y9C5 · amazon.nl · disclosed 2020-01-15

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, arguing the contested shaker reproduced the longstanding Boston Cocktail Shaker form.
  • It relied on Amazon listings from 2015 and 2020 for a Beaumont Boston Cocktail Shaker and said the contested design created the same overall impression.
  • The holder filed no observations, so the evidence of online disclosure was unrebutted.
  • The Division found average designer freedom, only minor differences, and no different overall impression, so the design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b).
  • The invalidity application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131632

vs DETECTALIA EUROPE, S.L.U.

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000129741

vs 2W ORGANIC

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131788

vs Liu Xiaoxia

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131628

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131704

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131745

vs Huan Wang

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000130924

vs SOHAI HOUSEWARES CO.,LTD.

2026-04-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131546

vs Foshan Changyuansheng Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078